Perez v. State

695 So. 2d 851, 1997 WL 330439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 689 So. 2d 306
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1997·No. No. 95-2651·Published

Opinion

Corrected Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On motion for clarification, the previous opinion of this court filed April 16, 1997, is vacated and withdrawn, and the corrected opinion is substituted.

As the State properly concedes, because the defendant’s prosecutions for armed burglary and grand theft were not commenced within the appropriate statute of limitations period, the judgments and sentences for these counts must be vacated. Maguire v. State, 453 So.2d 438, 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit. Therefore, the defendant’s remaining convictions are affirmed.

Affirmed, in part; vacated, in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. State, 695 So. 2d 851, 1997 WL 330439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 851 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maguire v. State
453 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)