Perez v. State
Opinion
Corrected Opinion
On motion for clarification, the previous opinion of this court filed April 16, 1997, is vacated and withdrawn, and the corrected opinion is substituted.
As the State properly concedes, because the defendant’s prosecutions for armed burglary and grand theft were not commenced within the appropriate statute of limitations period, the judgments and sentences for these counts must be vacated. Maguire v. State, 453 So.2d 438, 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit. Therefore, the defendant’s remaining convictions are affirmed.
Affirmed, in part; vacated, in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
695 So. 2d 851 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.