Perez v. State

695 So. 2d 741, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11646, 1996 WL 637691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 647 So. 2d 1007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1996·No. No. 96-1319·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Perez appeals a trial court order denying his sworn motion for return of personal property seized by the police at the time of an arrest of another person. The state has filed a confession of error in this case which we must accept in light of the lack of evidentiary support for the trial court’s order and the legal precedent controlling motions for return of property seized by police during searches. See, e.g., §§ 790.08(3), 933.14(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); San Pedro v. [742]*742Metro-Dade Police Dep’t, 583 So.2d 406 (Fia. 3d DCA 1991); Carneiro v. State, 464 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Baker v. State, 343 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 953 (Fla.1977). Thus, reversal is mandated so that Perez’s personal property can be returned to him.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. State, 695 So. 2d 741, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11646, 1996 WL 637691 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

695 So. 2d 741 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carneiro v. State
464 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Baker v. State
343 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
San Pedro v. Metro-Dade Police Department
583 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)