San Pedro v. Metro-Dade Police Department
Opinion
The trial judge denied the appellant’s motion for the return of firearms admittedly owned by him which had been seized pursuant to a search warrant issued in connection with a subsequently nolle prossed action against his son. The basis for the ruling was the conclusion that the motion, filed approximately one year after the nolle prosse, was untimely as in violation of the six month period for the reclamation of seized weapons provided by section 790.08(5), Florida Statutes (1989). This was error. Section 790.081 deals with fire[407] arms taken from an arrested person, used in the commission of an armed felony, or which had been abandoned or discarded. It has utterly no application to this case. The present situation is instead governed by section 933.14(3), which provides as follows:
No pistol or firearm taken by any officer with a search warrant or without a search warrant upon a view by the officer of a breach of the peace shall be returned except pursuant to an order of a circuit judge or a county court judge.
See Sawyer v. Gable, 400 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Unlike section 790.08(5), this provision has no specific time limitation. Since, even assuming the existence of such a requirement,2 there is no question that the motion was filed within a reasonable time, and there is no other basis for denying the relief sought, the order under review is reversed with directions to grant the motion.
Reversed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
583 So. 2d 406 (San Pedro v. Metro-Dade Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.