Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. State

520 So. 2d 650, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 521, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 692, 1988 WL 12519

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 1988

DocketNo. 87-817

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 650 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. State, 520 So. 2d 650, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 521, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 692, 1988 WL 12519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that defense counsel’s alleged deficiencies of failing to object to evidence presented by the state would, under proper objection, have been cured and overcome by the state, and that the remaining deficiencies were simply tactical in nature. More importantly, on the assumption that the deficiencies were established, the trial court nonetheless found that under the circumstances, they would not have altered the result. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984). The order denying the defendant’s motion for post-judgment relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that defense counsel’s alleged deficiencies of failing to object to evidence presented by the state would, under proper objection, have been cured and overcome by the state, and that the remaining deficiencies were simply tactical in nature. More importantly, on the assumption that the deficiencies were established, the trial court nonetheless found that under the circumstances, they would not have altered the result. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984). The order denying the defendant’s motion for post-judgment relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 So. 2d 650, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 521, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 692, 1988 WL 12519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack