Perez v. State

520 So. 2d 650, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 521, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 692, 1988 WL 12519
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 1988·No. No. 87-817·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that defense counsel’s alleged deficiencies of failing to object to evidence presented by the state would, under proper objection, have been cured and overcome by the state, and that the remaining deficiencies were simply tactical in nature. More importantly, on the assumption that the deficiencies were established, the trial court nonetheless found that under the circumstances, they would not have altered the result. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984). The order denying the defendant’s motion for post-judgment relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. State, 520 So. 2d 650, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 521, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 692, 1988 WL 12519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

520 So. 2d 650 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Miami General Hosp. v. Goldberg
520 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)