Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Young

People v. Young

28 A.D.3d 592, 811 N.Y.S.2d 921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 A.D.3d 1120 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated December 12, 2003, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered February 24, 1998.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, he was afforded meaningful representation at trial under both the Federal and State constitutions (see US Const Amend VI; NY Const, art I, [593]*593§ 6; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143 [2005]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]; People v Harris, 211 AD2d 685 [1995]; People v Flores, 160 AD2d 1020 [1990]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Young, 28 A.D.3d 592, 811 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 592 (People v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Caban
833 N.E.2d 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Flores
160 A.D.2d 1020 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Harris
211 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)