People v. Young

16 A.D.3d 196, 790 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 196 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Young, 16 A.D.3d 196, 790 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J., on motion; John Cataldo, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered October 2, 2002, convicting defendant of robbery in the first and second degrees and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 17 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant’s display of the knife constituted, in part, a threat that defendant would stab the victim if he tried to recover the property that defendant had taken (see e.g. People v Williams, 221 AD2d 246 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 926 [1996]). Therefore, defendant was properly convicted of a completed first-degree robbery.

The motion court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence as the product of an unlawful detention was proper because defendant’s papers were insufficient to raise a factual issue requiring a hearing (see People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 [1993]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Friedman, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sharma
112 A.D.3d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.3d 196, 790 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-nyappdiv-2005.