People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Young

247 A.D.2d 651, 668 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 928

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D.2d 651 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Young, 247 A.D.2d 651, 668 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Leaman, J.), rendered July 26, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment because he finds no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. We agree. The record reveals that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to two counts of burglary in the second degree in full satisfaction of the outstanding indictment, that he waived his right to appeal, and that he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements to consecutive prison terms aggregating 6½ to 13½ years. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of conviction and grant defense counsel’s application to withdraw (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Leaman, J.), rendered July 26, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment because he finds no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. We agree. The record reveals that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to two counts of burglary in the second degree in full satisfaction of the outstanding indictment, that he waived his right to appeal, and that he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements to consecutive prison terms aggregating 6½ to 13½ years. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of conviction and grant defense counsel’s application to withdraw (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 651, 668 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack