People v. Young
This text of 4 A.D.3d 441 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Chambers, J.), rendered August 14, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge since he failed to demonstrate that the uncalled witness would be expected to testify in the People’s favor (see People v Kitching, 78 NY2d 532 [1991]; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424 [1986]). We note that the People cannot [442]*442raise the issue of untimeliness of the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge for the first time on appeal (see People v Erts, 73 NY2d 872, 874 [1988]; People v Martin, 208 AD2d 770 [1994]; People v Farrow, 187 AD2d 667 [1992]; People v Brown, 183 AD2d 569, 570 [1992]).
The defendant’s remaining contention raised in his supplemental pro se brief is without merit. Smith, J.E, Goldstein, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.3d 441, 771 N.Y.S.2d 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-nyappdiv-2004.