People v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 328, 146 A.D.3d 905, 44 N.Y.S.3d 775
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 2017·No. 2014-09783·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 14, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see *906 People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Rennick, 123 AD3d 1146 [2014]; People v Reyes, 121 AD3d 820 [2014]; People v Coleman, 116 AD3d 708 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Cohen, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 328, 146 A.D.3d 905, 44 N.Y.S.3d 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 328 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Reyes
121 A.D.3d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Rennick
123 A.D.3d 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Coleman
116 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)