People v. Rennick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rennick

123 A.D.3d 1146, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637, 2014 NY Slip Op 09154, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9072

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 2014·No. 2012-11473·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J), imposed November 30, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, *1147 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J), imposed November 30, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, *1147 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

People v. Rennick, 123 A.D.3d 1146, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637, 2014 NY Slip Op 09154, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

123 A.D.3d 1146 (People v. Rennick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related