People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Williams

113 A.D.3d 423, 977 N.Y.2d 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.3d 423 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williams, 113 A.D.3d 423, 977 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[424]*424Defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the mandatory surcharge should be raised in the sentencing court by way of a motion for resentencing at the end of a defendant’s incarceration (People v Bradley, 249 AD2d 103 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 923 [1998]). Consequently, defendant’s arguments to this Court are premature. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[424]*424Defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the mandatory surcharge should be raised in the sentencing court by way of a motion for resentencing at the end of a defendant’s incarceration (People v Bradley, 249 AD2d 103 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 923 [1998]). Consequently, defendant’s arguments to this Court are premature. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.3d 423, 977 N.Y.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack