People v. Williams
49 A.D.3d 518, 851 N.Y.2d 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The defendant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating him a level three sex offender (see People v Maiello, 32 AD3d 463 [2006]; People v Guarnan, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]; cf. People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515, 516 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Williams, 49 A.D.3d 518, 851 N.Y.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 518 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Padro
84 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Burgess
80 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Bennis
77 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)