People v. Maiello
This text of 32 A.D.3d 463 (People v. Maiello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated July 18, 2005, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant did not demonstrate circumstances which would warrant a departure from the presumptive level three risk level assigned to him under the risk assessment instrument (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). The defendant’s evidence, while demonstrating that he had made efforts toward rehabilitation and treatment, was conclusory and unsubstantiated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.3d 463, 819 N.Y.S.2d 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maiello-nyappdiv-2006.