People v. Williams

46 A.D.3d 652, 846 N.Y.S.2d 582
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), dated June 15, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778 [2006]; People v Robert I., 33 AD3d 777 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention, that he is entitled to a downward departure is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Graham, 35 AD3d 299 [2006]) and, in any event, is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 46 A.D.3d 652, 846 N.Y.S.2d 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 652 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Estrella
90 A.D.3d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Nesbitt
79 A.D.3d 1116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)