People v. Williams

307 A.D.2d 474, 761 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8027
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 275 A.D.2d 967

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Rosen, J.), [475]*475rendered September 21, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the first degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted burglary in the first degree and was sentenced to a determinate prison term of five years ánd 2V2 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive given his lack of criminal history, educational and employment history, family support and remorse for his conduct. Inasmuch as defendant’s general waiver of his right to appeal included the challenge to the severity of his sentence, this issue is not subject to our review (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). In any event, were we to consider it, we would find that County Court considered all relevant factors in imposing the sentence and there are no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Dolphy, 257 AD2d 681 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 872 [1999]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 307 A.D.2d 474, 761 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8027 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 474 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Dolphy
257 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)