People v. Williams

274 A.D.2d 527, 712 N.Y.S.2d 371, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8152
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D.2d 833

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bárbaro, J.), rendered March 5, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and impos[528]*528ing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony (see, People v Clemons, 166 AD2d 363).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Ritter, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 274 A.D.2d 527, 712 N.Y.S.2d 371, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

274 A.D.2d 527 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Clemons
166 A.D.2d 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)