People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Williams

268 A.D.2d 541, 701 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 541 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williams, 268 A.D.2d 541, 701 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered June 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), under Indictment No. 3659/96, upon a plea of guilty, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, under Indictment No. 830/97, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s pleas constituted an automatic forfeiture of his right to appellate review of his argument that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30; People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009; People v Smith, 249 AD2d 426). The defendant’s argument based on his constitutional [542]*542right to a speedy trial (US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 6), which survived both the plea and the defendant’s express waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273), is without merit (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered June 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), under Indictment No. 3659/96, upon a plea of guilty, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, under Indictment No. 830/97, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s pleas constituted an automatic forfeiture of his right to appellate review of his argument that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30; People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009; People v Smith, 249 AD2d 426). The defendant’s argument based on his constitutional [542]*542right to a speedy trial (US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 6), which survived both the plea and the defendant’s express waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273), is without merit (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 541, 701 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack