People v. Williams

208 A.D.2d 662, 618 N.Y.S.2d 224
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), rendered July 2, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he was denied a fair trial when the court refused to admit a police tape recording of the drug transaction which led to his conviction. The determination of whether a tape is "sufficiently audible” is a decision within the sound discretion of the trial court, and there is no evidence in this case that the court improvidently exercised this discretion (see, People v Lubow, 29 NY2d 58).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Martinez, 177 AD2d 600). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 208 A.D.2d 662, 618 N.Y.S.2d 224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosner
60 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. West
281 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Sagado
228 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)