People v. Williams
179 A.D.2d 835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D.2d 515 →
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mengano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Williams, 179 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
179 A.D.2d 835 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)