People v. Williams

147 A.D.2d 904, 537 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1156
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court’s charge on prompt complaint was correct. Evidence that the complainant in a rape case did make timely complaint is admissible as bearing on her credibility (see, Richardson, Evidence §292 [Prince 10th ed]). "[L]ike outcries made at the time of the act charged, the appearance and manner of the female immediately after, her instant complaints of the fact are all such as are natural and according to the ordinary course of events; and therefore are corroborative of her statements on the witness stand” (Baccio v People, 41 NY 265, 268). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 147 A.D.2d 904, 537 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

147 A.D.2d 904 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Geddes
186 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Patterson
149 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)