People v. Wicks

42 A.D.3d 585, 838 N.Y.S.2d 267
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 42 A.D.3d 585 (People v. Wicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wicks, 42 A.D.3d 585, 838 N.Y.S.2d 267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered January 26, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while intoxicated (two counts), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree.

An August 2004 indictment charged defendant with various crimes. Resolving the indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree. Defendant also waived indictment and pleaded guilty in satisfaction of a superior court information which charged him with driving while intoxicated in October 2004. County Court sentenced defendant to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years for each of his convictions.

Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that his waiver of indictment was jurisdictionally defective because the record does not reflect that he executed the written waiver in open court with his attorney present. Although the plea minutes are silent with regard to defendant’s signing of the waiver, County Court’s order approving the waiver expressly indicates that defendant executed it in open court in the presence of his attorney (see People v Rivera, 24 AD3d 367, 369-370 [2005]; see also People v Hill, 269 AD2d 404, 405 [2000], lv denied 94 NY2d 920 [2000]). Accordingly, we are satisfied that defendant’s waiver of indictment was in compliance with CPL 195.20 and we affirm the judgment of conviction.

Cardona, PJ., Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Patterson
2024 NY Slip Op 02729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Rickman
208 A.D.3d 1389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Corr
2018 NY Slip Op 1933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Surico
138 A.D.3d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Simmons
110 A.D.3d 1371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Catnott
92 A.D.3d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Davis
84 A.D.3d 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A.D.3d 585, 838 N.Y.S.2d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wicks-nyappdiv-2007.