People v. Surico

138 A.D.3d 899, 28 N.Y.S.3d 330
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 2016·No. 2014-11319·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered November 25, 2014, convicting him of robbery in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, since his waiver of indictment satisfied all of the requirements of the New York Constitution and CPL article 195, the waiver of indictment was valid (see NY Const. art I, § 6; CPL 195.10, 195.20; People v Sze, 113 AD3d 795 [2014]; People v Davis, 84 AD3d 1645, 1646 [2011]; People v Wicks, 42 AD3d 585 [2007]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

*900 The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Surico, 138 A.D.3d 899, 28 N.Y.S.3d 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 899 (People v. Surico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Giddens
2019 NY Slip Op 4195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Mohan
2019 NY Slip Op 1429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Tennyson
2018 NY Slip Op 2188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Cardona-Velasquez
2017 NY Slip Op 5617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)