People v. Surico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Surico

138 A.D.3d 899, 28 N.Y.S.3d 330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 2016

Docket2014-11319

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 899 (People v. Surico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Surico, 138 A.D.3d 899, 28 N.Y.S.3d 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered November 25, 2014, convicting him of robbery in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, since his waiver of indictment satisfied all of the requirements of the New York Constitution and CPL article 195, the waiver of indictment was valid (see NY Const. art I, § 6; CPL 195.10, 195.20; People v Sze, 113 AD3d 795 [2014]; People v Davis, 84 AD3d 1645, 1646 [2011]; People v Wicks, 42 AD3d 585 [2007]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

*900 The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI