People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hill

268 A.D.2d 251, 700 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 327

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 251 (People v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hill, 268 A.D.2d 251, 700 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J., at hearing; Ronald Zweibel, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 5, 1996, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 V2 to 25 years, I2V2 to 25 years, 7V2 to 15 years, 7V2 to 15 years, and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant failed to establish that the suppression hearing evidence raised substantial issues about the suggestiveness of the lineup procedure requiring the testimony of the identifying witnesses (see, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, cert denied 498 US 833). Concur—Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J., at hearing; Ronald Zweibel, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 5, 1996, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 V2 to 25 years, I2V2 to 25 years, 7V2 to 15 years, 7V2 to 15 years, and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant failed to establish that the suppression hearing evidence raised substantial issues about the suggestiveness of the lineup procedure requiring the testimony of the identifying witnesses (see, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, cert denied 498 US 833). Concur—Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 251, 700 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hill-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack