People v. Walker

147 A.D.2d 927, 538 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1214
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 A.D.2d 521

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is ample support in the record for the court’s conclusion that Joseph Tatar, a fellow inmate of defendant at the holding center, was not acting as an agent for the People when he heard defendant’s incriminating statements. Similarly, there is no evidence that Tatar elicited the incriminating statement by his conduct (People v Cardona, 41 NY2d 333, 335; People v Kinder, 75 AD2d 34, 44).

We have reviewed the other arguments raised by defendant on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Stiller, J. — murder, [928]*928second degree; robbery, second degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 147 A.D.2d 927, 538 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

147 A.D.2d 927 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kinder
75 A.D.2d 34 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)