People v. Walker

119 A.D.2d 779, 501 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55719
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 573

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered June 21, 1984, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and thus [780]*780has not preserved his claims for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, during the allocution, the requisite element of the charged crime was established and the defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty thereto (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, the defendant received the sentence which he bargained for, which was not excessive (see, People v Montez, 111 AD2d 877). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 119 A.D.2d 779, 501 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

119 A.D.2d 779 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Montez
111 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)