People v. Walker

129 A.D.2d 825, 514 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45527
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 573

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered June 7, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, criminal mischief in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quantity and quality to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

As to the defendant’s conviction of criminal mischief in the third degree, we find that the evidence, although circumstantial, was inconsistent with the defendant’s innocence and excluded to a moral certainty every other reasonable hypothesis but his guilt (see, People v Way, 59 NY2d 361, 365; People v Milea, 112 AD2d 1011, lv denied 66 NY2d 921). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 129 A.D.2d 825, 514 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

129 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Way
452 N.E.2d 1181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Milea
112 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)