People v. Vasquez

2018 NY Slip Op 4767
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.3d 1584
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 2018·No. 2017-03788·Published

Opinion

People v Vasquez (2018 NY Slip Op 04767)
People v Vasquez
2018 NY Slip Op 04767
Decided on June 27, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 27, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ROBERT J. MILLER
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2017-03788

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Hector Vasquez, appellant.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Barbara Kahn, J.), dated March 1, 2017, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant appeals from an order, made after a hearing, designating him a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed 30 points against him under risk factor 3 and 20 points against him under risk factor 7 of the risk assessment instrument (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416; People v Young, 152 AD3d 628, 628; People v Reuter, 140 AD3d 1143, 1143). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Young, 152 AD3d at 628; People v Reuter, 140 AD3d at 1143; see also People v Rossano, 140 AD3d 1042, 1043).

Accordingly, the County Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 2018 NY Slip Op 4767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 4767 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Rossano
140 A.D.3d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Reuter
140 A.D.3d 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Young
2017 NY Slip Op 5627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)