People v. Vasquez

131 A.D.3d 1076, 16 N.Y.S.3d 464
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 2015·No. 2013-05604·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), imposed May 9, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes *1077 review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]). However, to the extent that the defendant asserts that the Supreme Court failed to exercise its discretion at sentencing (cf. People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 306 [1981]), that contention survives the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Gary, 106 AD3d 932, 933 [2013]; People v Nolcox, 40 AD3d 1128 [2007]). Nevertheless, the record reveals that the court providently exercised its discretion at sentencing, upon consideration, inter alia, of the probation report and statements made at sentencing (see People v Gray, 51 AD3d 945 [2008]; People v Vega, 51 AD3d 694 [2008]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 131 A.D.3d 1076, 16 N.Y.S.3d 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

131 A.D.3d 1076 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guin
2024 NY Slip Op 03764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Lashley
2018 NY Slip Op 8507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Dib
134 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)