People v. Reuter
This text of 140 A.D.3d 1143 (People v. Reuter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated June 24, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed 30 points under risk factor 3 (number of victims) and 20 points under risk factor 7 (relationship with victim) based upon his conviction, in Wyoming, of possession of child pornography (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416 [2008]; People v Hamilton, 139 AD3d 928 [2016]; People v Granzeier, 137 AD3d 989 [2016]; People v Wooten, 136 AD3d 1305 [2016]). In addition, the County Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated him a level three sex offender (see People v Rukasov, 132 AD3d 748, 749 [2015]; People v Morel-Baca, 127 AD3d 833, 834 [2015]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D.3d 1143, 33 N.Y.S.3d 757, 2016 NY Slip Op 05134, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reuter-nyappdiv-2016.