People v. Van Sickle

192 N.E.2d 9, 13 N.Y.2d 61, 242 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1022
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 10, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by51 cases

This text of 192 N.E.2d 9 (People v. Van Sickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Van Sickle, 192 N.E.2d 9, 13 N.Y.2d 61, 242 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinions

Chief Judge Desmond.

I join in the court’s negative answer to the only question presented to us on this appeal, that is: must a criminal conviction be reversed solely because the lay complaining witness was allowed to conduct the prosecution? If there was before us for decision the much broader question as to the District Attorney’s rights and duties I would say that the courts as well as the District Attorney himself must obey the plain, clear mandate of subdivision 1 of section 700 of the County Law. That statute does not necessarily mean that the District Attorney or his deputy must be physically present at every criminal hearing in the county. However, it means at least that the District Attorney, as the elected representative of the people and charged with this responsibility, must carry the responsibility and must set up a system whereby he knows of all the criminal [63]*63prosecutions in his county and either appears therein in person or by assistant or consents to appearance on his behalf by other public officers or private attorneys.

I concur for reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Meigh
2024 NY Slip Op 50372(U) (New York Town and Village Courts, 2024)
Sedore v. Epstein
56 A.D.2d 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Christensen
21 Misc. 3d 608 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Sedore v. Epstein
15 Misc. 3d 866 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1996
Haggerty v. Himelein
221 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Soddano
655 N.E.2d 161 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Linares v. Senkowski
964 F.2d 1295 (Second Circuit, 1992)
People v. Garfield
152 Misc. 2d 51 (Clarkstown Justice Court, 1991)
People v. Calderone
151 Misc. 2d 530 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1991)
People v. Benoit
152 Misc. 2d 115 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1991)
People v. Carter
566 N.E.2d 119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Karst
166 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Pizzaro
146 Misc. 2d 527 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Jackson
145 Misc. 2d 1020 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Abajian
142 Misc. 2d 250 (New York Town and Village Courts, 1989)
Darvin M. v. Jacobs
509 N.E.2d 336 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Informal Opinion No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1986
People v. Vial
132 Misc. 2d 5 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.E.2d 9, 13 N.Y.2d 61, 242 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-sickle-ny-1963.