People v. Turner

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Turner

167 N.W.2d 779, 16 Mich. App. 269, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1366

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,254

StatusPublished

This text of 167 N.W.2d 779 (People v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Turner, 167 N.W.2d 779, 16 Mich. App. 269, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1366 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted of felonious driving contrary to MOLA § 752.191 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.661). On appeal it is contended that the lower court erred in its instructions to the jury. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

No objection being made during trial, the question is not properly preserved for appellate review, GCR 1963, 516.2. The question presented is so unsubstantial that it requires no formal argument or submission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted of felonious driving contrary to MOLA § 752.191 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.661). On appeal it is contended that the lower court erred in its instructions to the jury. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

No objection being made during trial, the question is not properly preserved for appellate review, GCR 1963, 516.2. The question presented is so unsubstantial that it requires no formal argument or submission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.W.2d 779, 16 Mich. App. 269, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-turner-michctapp-1969.