People v. Torres

96 A.D.3d 883, 946 N.Y.S.2d 479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 A.D.3d 709

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered June 24, 2010, convicting her of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Hure, 16 AD3d 774, 775 [2005]).

The defendant’s remaining contention does not require reversal. Dillon, J.P., Eng, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 96 A.D.3d 883, 946 N.Y.S.2d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 883 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Hure
16 A.D.3d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)