People v. Torres
69 A.D.3d 886, 892 N.Y.2d 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 A.D.3d 925 →
Opinion
[887]*887The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentences actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that his sentences were excessive (see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; People v Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572 [2009]; People v Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630 [2008]). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.E, Covello, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Torres, 69 A.D.3d 886, 892 N.Y.2d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).
69 A.D.3d 886 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Grigg
53 A.D.3d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Ubiles
59 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)