People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Torres

69 A.D.3d 886, 892 N.Y.2d 779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.3d 886 (People v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Torres, 69 A.D.3d 886, 892 N.Y.2d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

[887]*887The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentences actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that his sentences were excessive (see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; People v Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572 [2009]; People v Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630 [2008]). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.E, Covello, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[887]*887The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentences actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that his sentences were excessive (see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; People v Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572 [2009]; People v Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630 [2008]). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.E, Covello, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.3d 886, 892 N.Y.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-torres-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack