People v. Toney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Toney

215 A.D.2d 791, 627 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5735

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 215 A.D.2d 791 (People v. Toney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Toney, 215 A.D.2d 791, 627 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered October 4, 1993, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The contentions raised by the defendant on this appeal are not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to raise them at sentencing, he failed to move to withdraw his plea, and he failed to move to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the minutes of the plea proceeding reveal that the Supreme Court conducted a sufficient inquiry into, and properly rejected, the defendant’s unsupported assertions of innocence and coercion. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered October 4, 1993, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The contentions raised by the defendant on this appeal are not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to raise them at sentencing, he failed to move to withdraw his plea, and he failed to move to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the minutes of the plea proceeding reveal that the Supreme Court conducted a sufficient inquiry into, and properly rejected, the defendant’s unsupported assertions of innocence and coercion. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 791, 627 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-toney-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack