People v. Palmeri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Palmeri

227 A.D.2d 418, 642 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 418 (People v. Palmeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Palmeri, 227 A.D.2d 418, 642 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered February 24, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty without first conducting a hearing, since the plea and sentencing minutes reveal that the [419]*419County Court conducted a sufficient inquiry into, and properly rejected, the defendant’s unsupported assertions of innocence and coercion (see, People v Toney, 215 AD2d 791; People v Billings, 208 AD2d 941). Additionally, the court properly concluded that the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, the defendant has no basis to complain now that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered February 24, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty without first conducting a hearing, since the plea and sentencing minutes reveal that the [419]*419County Court conducted a sufficient inquiry into, and properly rejected, the defendant’s unsupported assertions of innocence and coercion (see, People v Toney, 215 AD2d 791; People v Billings, 208 AD2d 941). Additionally, the court properly concluded that the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, the defendant has no basis to complain now that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 418, 642 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-palmeri-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack