People v. Kanat
This text of 40 A.D.3d 883 (People v. Kanat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, (DeRosa, J.), rendered May 27, 2004, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court conducted a sufficient inquiry regarding the assertions made by him in his pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543-544 [1993]; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]; People v Felix, 20 AD3d 433 [2005]), and providently exercised its discretion in denying that motion (see People v Gully, 17 AD3d 382 [2005]; People v Charles, 256 AD2d 472, 472-473 [1998]; People v Ellerbe, 237 AD2d 299 [1997]; People v Toney, 215 AD2d 791 [1995]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Dillon and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.3d 883, 834 N.Y.S.2d 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kanat-nyappdiv-2007.