People v. Thomas
88 A.D.3d 974, 931 N.Y.2d 526
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; see also People v Diaz, 76 AD3d 673 [2010]; People v Kendle, 47 AD3d 783 [2008]). Skelos, J.E, Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Thomas, 88 A.D.3d 974, 931 N.Y.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 974 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Carter
89 A.D.3d 1071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)