People v. Kendle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kendle

47 A.D.3d 783, 849 N.Y.S.2d 157

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), dated April 12, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), dated April 12, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

People v. Kendle, 47 A.D.3d 783, 849 N.Y.S.2d 157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

47 A.D.3d 783 (People v. Kendle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related