People v. Thomas

58 A.D.3d 445, 871 N.Y.S.2d 95
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgement, Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret Clancy, J.), rendered January 20, 2006, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of attempted aggravated harassment in the second degree, and sentencing her to a conditional discharge, unanimously affirmed.

With respect to the conviction of attempted aggravated harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.30 (1), the accusatory instrument was facially sufficient, and the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 [446]*446NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Defendant’s telephone call to the victim contained a death threat that placed the victim in reasonable fear for her safety (see People v Limage, 19 Misc 3d 395, 400 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2008]; People v Tiffany, 186 Misc 2d 917, 920-921 [Crim Ct, NY County 2001]).

With respect to the conviction relating to Penal Law § 240.30 (2), defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the accusatory instrument is without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 58 A.D.3d 445, 871 N.Y.S.2d 95 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

58 A.D.3d 445 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Knowings (Herman)
70 Misc. 3d 141(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. McClean (Denise)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019