People v. Thomas

302 A.D.2d 616, 755 N.Y.S.2d 312
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the de[617]*617fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered January 14, 1998, convicting her of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly denied her Batson motion (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]) since she failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination (see People v Blackford, 256 AD2d 619, 620 [1998]). The prosecutor’s exercise of a peremptory challenge against one black prospective juror fails, without more, to establish a Batson violation (see People v Cousin, 272 AD2d 477, 478 [2000]; People v Hinton, 285 AD2d 476 [2001]; People v Blackford, supra).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 302 A.D.2d 616, 755 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 616 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Lord
396 F. Supp. 2d 327 (E.D. New York, 2005)
People v. Chowdhury
22 A.D.3d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)