People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thomas

268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 648

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 540 (People v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thomas, 268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[541]*541fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), rendered May 29, 1998, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and resisting arrest, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; People v Thomas, 259 AD2d 641). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the de[541]*541fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), rendered May 29, 1998, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and resisting arrest, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; People v Thomas, 259 AD2d 641). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack