People v. Thomas

270 A.D.2d 368, 704 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 246

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), rendered November 25, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the defendant failed to raise the issue before the trial court, his present challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859; People v Vega, 183 AD2d 864, 865). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). Thompson, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 270 A.D.2d 368, 704 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 368 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Vega
183 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)