People v. Stevenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stevenson

249 A.D.2d 968, 671 N.Y.S.2d 392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1998

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 968 (People v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stevenson, 249 A.D.2d 968, 671 N.Y.S.2d 392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his guilty pleas or to vacate the judgments upon the specific grounds raised on appeal, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty pleas were not voluntarily entered (see, People v Jeffrey, 239 AD2d 953, lv denied 90 NY2d 894). Defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Coleman [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827). His contention that the suppression ruling was erroneous does not survive the valid waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Outling, [969]*969231 AD2d 911, lv denied 89 NY2d 945). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his guilty pleas or to vacate the judgments upon the specific grounds raised on appeal, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty pleas were not voluntarily entered (see, People v Jeffrey, 239 AD2d 953, lv denied 90 NY2d 894). Defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Coleman [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827). His contention that the suppression ruling was erroneous does not survive the valid waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Outling, [969]*969231 AD2d 911, lv denied 89 NY2d 945). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 968, 671 N.Y.S.2d 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stevenson-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack