People v. Stevenson
This text of 245 A.D.2d 319 (People v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Brill, J.), rendered February 2, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree and promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor made improper remarks during summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879; People v Tardbania, 72 NY2d 852, 853). In any event, while the contested remarks would have been better left [320]*320unsaid, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, any error in the prosecution’s summation was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242; People v Ortiz, 239 AD2d 611; People v Melendez, 143 AD2d 946, 947). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D.2d 319, 670 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stevenson-nyappdiv-1997.