People v. Tardbania
This text of 528 N.E.2d 507 (People v. Tardbania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).
We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 N.E.2d 507, 72 N.Y.2d 852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tardbania-ny-1988.