People v. Sneed
This text of 191 A.D.2d 969 (People v. Sneed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that his state[970]*970ment should have been suppressed based on a violation of Payton v New York (445 US 573) was not raised before the suppression court and is unpreserved for our review (see, People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029). We decline to reach that issue in the interest of justice. We modify, however, to provide that all sentences run concurrently (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.— Attempted Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D.2d 969, 595 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sneed-nyappdiv-1993.