People v. Moore
This text of 212 A.D.2d 1062 (People v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Oswego County Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]) and thus was subject to punishment of a fine, a period of imprisonment, or both (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 [1] [c]). County Court’s statement that there was a mandatory minimum fine was based upon a misapprehension that the court did not have discretion in sentencing. The sentence therefore is vacated and the matter is remitted to Oswego County Court for resentencing (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433; People v Woodard, 201 AD2d 896; People v Horn, 161 AD2d 492; People v Taylor, 27 AD2d 692). The failure of the court to apprehend the extent of its discretion is a departure from the " 'essential nature’ of the right to be sentenced as provided by law” (People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 156; see, People v Woodard, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Oswego County Court, Brandt, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D.2d 1062, 623 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moore-nyappdiv-1995.