People v. Kennedy

236 A.D.2d 858, 653 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1795

This text of 236 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kennedy, 236 A.D.2d 858, 653 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea before sentencing, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea (see, People v Ramirez, 159 AD2d 392, lv denied 76 NY2d 863). In any event, the record establishes that defendant entered the plea knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. Defendant has also failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the District Attorney’s sentencing recommendation (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to exercise our power to review that challenge as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ramirez
159 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D.2d 858, 653 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kennedy-nyappdiv-1997.